SLAM Remote: Creating a Live Performance in a Remote Location
Dance companies are beginning to stream live
performances to reach more audiences. While streaming captures the visual aspects of a dance performance, it fails to portray other important elements—interaction between dancers and audiences, physical participation, or even just the heightened sense of excitement and atmosphere of being at a live event. How can a dance company use technology to enhance the experience of remote viewers? If audiences are involved physically from the remote location, rather than merely viewing passively, will it increase the impact of the show for them? How can a remote show be made to feel “live”?
SLAM REMOTE is a new presentation model that uses technology to create verbal and kinetic exchanges among audiences at different physical locations.
For decades, Brooklyn-based STREB has emphasized audience participation in its performances, allowing viewers to step onto the stage, try out equipment, and meet the dancers. Now, with EDA’s help, STREB has translated the feeling of SLAM, its own venue and engagement style, to a new model of live streaming for off-site audiences.
SLAM REMOTE utilizes the concept of SLAM on a conceptual level (encouraging rough and ready experimentation, fostering audience/performer interaction, and breaking down physical and conceptual barriers) and in practical ways (offering small scale touring options, ensuring a flexible residency design, and engaging new technologies). Growing out of the company’s concern that solutions to the erosion of audiences have centered on the use of technology as a replacement for “real” as opposed to virtual interaction, SLAM REMOTE continues STREB’s goal to rewrite the traditional rules of audience behavior.
In SLAM Remote, STREB works with an off-site presenter to simulcast both the show and audience reactions at each location—home and off-site—on large video screens. Three elements are key to the experience:
- Before the show, a STREB artist conducts a residency with the offsite presenter, usually for a group of children.
- At the show, STREB involves music, djs, and dialogue between participants, back and forth, from both locations.
- At the end of the show, the children in the remote location perform what they learned during the residency, which is broadcast back to Brooklyn.
After the first SLAM Remote met with technological difficulties, crucial changes were made for the second show (at the NJ Crossroads Theatre in December 2010). STREB learned to utilize a satellite company instead of Internet streaming, as well as to do significant planning in advance (see below). In fact, the company found it needed to have a separate crew, storyboard and dj at each location. During a 6-week residency four dancers traveled to NJ to work with a group of 18 students, to created an original 12 minute work. The second try was a great success, with both audiences getting to experience an exciting, circus-like atmosphere, live dance, and participatory interaction. As staff reflects, there was a “crystallizing moment during the NJ performance was the palpable awareness of connection – between audiences in two locations, between performers at two highly different levels of development but equal levels of commitment and the sense of pride which exploded the possibilities for the kids, the artist and the audience members alike.” (Refer to blog posts from each show.)
STREB implemented a series of in-venue post-performance audience surveys in order to gauge reactions to the SLAM REMOTE format, from the perspectives of Streb’s home audience in Brooklyn, NY, and the remote audience in New Jersey. While Brooklyn audiences reported a slightly higher captivation level due presumably to their presence at the fully live performance in the SLAM space itself, audiences in NJ felt a stronger social bond than those in Brooklyn. And, NJ audiences reported that they may pay up to $13 for a ticket to see a live broadcast.
The lessons that STREB shares are highly instructive to those who might consider similar experiments.
The choice of partner organization is critical to success, and should be a presenter with deep experience in producing, programming and education, and an established infrastructure. Technology must be chosen carefully; at that time of this project, the goals could only be realized by using a combination of satellite and internet. The production company was accustomed to simulcasting conferences and sporting events, bringing both the technical and human resources necessary. The artistic and other human resources will be a major consideration; organizations that attempt this must accept that they will be, in essence, producing two shows simultaneously and likely have to hire two crews. Paying time and attention to developing the storyboard allows for pre-planning of camera locations, timing, etc. and attending several rehearsals “allowed the videographers to capture both the scope and the scale of STREB’s work, as well as the energy, personality, and immediacy of the performers”, resulting in a “tangible sense of connection.” Regarding the budget, the project was meant to find a cost-effective solution for touring, when instead, the satellite was more expensive than anticipated. However, alternative tech options can likely be found and among the promising options on the horizon are VSAT, T1 connections and other arrangements, all of which would need to be explored as the technology evolves.
STREB’s keen interest in audience involvement and the spontaneity and energy of SLAM itself prompted this unique experiment.
The company hopes this new model will engage and diversify its audience, increase and deepen community and presenter relationships and establish a new stream of earned income. As STREB points out, clearly “there is an appetite amongst audiences for such an experience.” SLAM REMOTE has provided the field with the valuable new knowledge that “two separate audiences could be bonded through such an experience and could thereby create common ground.”
View a video of how STREB planned SLAM Remote and what it looked like
View a webinar, about SLAM Remote and hints about how to adapt it to your needs.
View a Powerpoint from the webinar.
Read two blog posts about STREB’s first experiment
and its second experiment
Read about EDA research
on the project.
Susan Meyers or
Cathy Einhorn at firstname.lastname@example.org
See also the
about this project that was presented during Dance/USA’s EDA Learning
Exchanges, including video presentations from the grantees themselves about
their project, as well as timelines, budgets, and other details.